Future of Munsford Drive property remains up in the air
While a Mississippi Court of Appeals decision overturned a lower court’s ruling that 29 acres of land on Munsford Drive should be zoned agricultural, the status of a once-potential asphalt plant on the property is in question.
Lehman-Roberts Paving Company of Memphis, Tenn. has an option on the land to continue earlier plans to construct the plant, said the land’s current owner, Booker Farr.
“I talked to Lehman-Roberts recently,” Farr said Friday. “They didn’t give me an indication on what they’re going to do. They just said they’d have to get their heads together.”
Lehman-Roberts’ Vice President David Greene would not give comment either on the court’s ruling, or on the company’s future plans for the Munsford property.
The asphalt-producing company had taken out an option on the land in late 2007, in anticipation of relocating one of its plants to New Albany, due to the fact that it had been awarded a contract with the state to pave portions of Highway 78. A group of New Albany residents, however, sought to block the plant’s construction, arguing that the land was mistakenly rezoned industrial around the time that the city of New Albany adopted its current zoning map. When the matter was heard by Circuit Court Judge Henry Lackey, he found that the city had not given proper and legal notice of a public hearing to discuss the new zoning map, and, therefore, the property should be reverted back to agricultural land.
The Court of Appeals, however, ruled that too much time had passed between the map’s adoption and the citizens’ protests. For that reason, the court ruled that Lackey’s decision be reversed.
“We’re pretty happy about that,” Farr said. “We felt pretty confident that we were going to win [the appeal].”
New Albany attorney Bill Rutledge, who represents the citizens in opposition, was disappointed with the Court of Appeals’ ruling.
“My understanding is that the Court of Appeals said that anyone can go and change the city’s zoning map, give no notice to anyone that it was changed and that change becomes final if nobody objects within a short period of time, even though anyone who might object to it had no notice of the change,” Rutledge said.
Rutledge went on to say that he had not yet met with his clients to discuss further options, but that he planned to recommend that they appeal the decision before the state’s Supreme Court.
About Chris Elkins
- Raineses to celebrate 50th wedding anniversary June 23, 2016
- Hurricane news June 28, 2016
- Macedonia news June 28, 2016
- Excel By 5 materials now available at Jennie Stephens Smith Library June 28, 2016
- Happy Fourth of July June 28, 2016
- Special session won’t help county June 28, 2016
- Only one issue of Gazette this week June 28, 2016
- Offices to close, service schedules change for July 4 holiday June 28, 2016
- Section of Bankhead Street closed this week June 28, 2016
- Truck causes power outage, other damage to downtown buildings June 28, 2016
- BRYNN11SCHMIDT: my family was looking for CMS-40B earlier today an...
- janifar soloman: Our experts know all the perfect way to solve your...
- GerryGorel820: I totally agree with the all questions you raised....
- PHYLLIS OPPERMAN: Savvy suggestions , I Appreciate the facts - Does ...
- 2DonaldBrick: Nice blog post - I am thankful for the points . Do...